User talk:Arturo - Revision history

Arturo: /* Linking Articles */

2006-02-20T14:36:22Z

‎Linking Articles

Lesoria: Linking Articles

2006-02-19T23:35:50Z

Linking Articles

Lesoria: /* Image Categories */

2006-01-31T01:43:00Z

‎Image Categories

Arturo: /* Image Categories */

2006-01-30T21:25:28Z

‎Image Categories

Iron Knuckle at 15:51, 30 January 2006

2006-01-30T15:51:33Z

Lesoria: Image Categories

2006-01-30T10:56:48Z

Image Categories

Arturo: Minor change??

2006-01-22T12:44:33Z

Minor change??

Davogones at 01:10, 22 January 2006

2006-01-22T01:10:38Z

Davogones: Suggestions

2006-01-17T17:19:48Z

Suggestions

New page

Hey Arturo, I have some suggestions. First, sign your name with four tildes to get your name and the date:
<pre>~~~~</pre>
Second, avoid first-person editorial comments such as "I conclude..." Instead use third-person objective, such as "One may conclude..." or "It can be concluded that..."
-[[User:Davogones|davogones]] 12:19, 17 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 20 February 2006
Line 38:		Line 38:

	--Lesoria		--Lesoria
		+
		+	Thank you Lesoria, I didn't know it. I'm certainly not very good with computers. But I'm getting better :)
		+	--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 09:36, 20 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 19 February 2006
Line 25:		Line 25:

	No problem there. The sprites themselves are normal size, the wiki-syntax simply made them double-sized to show detail. I've removed that bit, so now it shows them at regular size, consistent with other game sprites. --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 20:43, 30 January 2006 (EST)		No problem there. The sprites themselves are normal size, the wiki-syntax simply made them double-sized to show detail. I've removed that bit, so now it shows them at regular size, consistent with other game sprites. --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 20:43, 30 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	== Linking Articles ==
		+
		+	Hello, there. I wanted to say a way of linking articles which you may not know. I noticed you linked "bottles" as "<nowiki>[[Bottle\|bottles]]</nowiki>" recently. There is nothing wrong with it, but there is another way.
		+
		+	If you write the link as "<nowiki>[[bottle]]s</nowiki>", two things will happen with the link. It will make the "b" into a capital for the "link", and it will also link the "s" in the word. It does the same as "<nowiki>[[Bottle\|bottles]]</nowiki>", but it's much shorter =D
		+
		+	* <nowiki>[[Bottle\|bottles]]</nowiki> = [[Bottle\|bottles]]
		+	* <nowiki>[[bottle]]s</nowiki> = [[bottle]]s
		+
		+	Nice, eh? =)
		+
		+	--Lesoria

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:43, 31 January 2006
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Yes, Iron Knuckle, I agree with you that if they were a little bit smaller they would be nicer.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 16:25, 30 January 2006 (EST)		Yes, Iron Knuckle, I agree with you that if they were a little bit smaller they would be nicer.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 16:25, 30 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	No problem there. The sprites themselves are normal size, the wiki-syntax simply made them double-sized to show detail. I've removed that bit, so now it shows them at regular size, consistent with other game sprites. --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 20:43, 30 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 30 January 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:

	At least you fixed your mistake right away, other than that I think you are doing a good job so far. There one other thing however, I like the sprite set you used for Malon, but personally I don't really like blown up pixels. I know the sprites are small, but all those squares don't make it look nice IMO. I don't know how the other members think about this, so that's why I am asking.--[[User:Iron Knuckle\|Iron Knuckle]] 10:51, 30 January 2006 (EST)		At least you fixed your mistake right away, other than that I think you are doing a good job so far. There one other thing however, I like the sprite set you used for Malon, but personally I don't really like blown up pixels. I know the sprites are small, but all those squares don't make it look nice IMO. I don't know how the other members think about this, so that's why I am asking.--[[User:Iron Knuckle\|Iron Knuckle]] 10:51, 30 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Yes, Iron Knuckle, I agree with you that if they were a little bit smaller they would be nicer.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 16:25, 30 January 2006 (EST)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 What minor change are you talking about? If you mean my last one (in Ruto's article) I didn't think that changing the position of part of the article was a minor change. From what I know, minor changes are just ortographic corrections.--[[User:Arturo|Arturo]] 07:44, 22 January 2006 (EST)
 == Image Categories ==
@@ Line 17: / Line 19: @@
 --[[User:Lesoria|Lesoria]] 05:56, 30 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 30 January 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	What minor change are you talking about? If you mean my last one (in Ruto's article) I didn't think that changing the position of part of the article was a minor change. From what I know, minor changes are just ortographic corrections.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 07:44, 22 January 2006 (EST)		What minor change are you talking about? If you mean my last one (in Ruto's article) I didn't think that changing the position of part of the article was a minor change. From what I know, minor changes are just ortographic corrections.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 07:44, 22 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	== Image Categories ==
		+
		+	Hey, I've gone ahead and removed those categories I added for images. I shouldn't have added then, as that was a huge change without consensus. It was inexcusable, especially after I had just written a short time before about how I'd stick to small things.
		+
		+	At best I can only offer an explanation: I help out on a lot of wikis, and because of it adding categories to images is second nature, not unlike adding categories to pages.
		+
		+	Nonetheless, it was inexcusable for me to do, and I'll ''really'' stick to just filling out articles this time. My humblest apologies.
		+
		+	--[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 05:56, 30 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 22 January 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Arturo, don't forget to mark minor changes as minor. -[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 20:10, 21 January 2006 (EST)		Arturo, don't forget to mark minor changes as minor. -[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 20:10, 21 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	What minor change are you talking about? If you mean my last one (in Ruto's article) I didn't think that changing the position of part of the article was a minor change. From what I know, minor changes are just ortographic corrections.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 07:44, 22 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:10, 22 January 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Second, avoid first-person editorial comments such as "I conclude..." Instead use third-person objective, such as "One may conclude..." or "It can be concluded that..."		Second, avoid first-person editorial comments such as "I conclude..." Instead use third-person objective, such as "One may conclude..." or "It can be concluded that..."
	-[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 12:19, 17 January 2006 (EST)		-[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 12:19, 17 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Arturo, don't forget to mark minor changes as minor. -[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 20:10, 21 January 2006 (EST)