Talk:Princess Zelda - Revision history

Arturo: /* Reorganization suggestion */

2006-03-15T13:59:06Z

‎Reorganization suggestion

Davogones: /* Reorganization suggestion */

2006-03-15T06:29:41Z

‎Reorganization suggestion

Arturo: /* Reorganization suggestion */

2006-03-13T18:22:00Z

‎Reorganization suggestion

Davogones: Reorganization suggestion

2006-03-13T18:03:55Z

Reorganization suggestion

Iron Knuckle: /* Zelda in SSBM */

2006-03-11T15:41:43Z

‎Zelda in SSBM

Arturo: /* Zelda in SSBM */

2006-03-10T20:32:01Z

‎Zelda in SSBM

Lesoria: /* Zelda in SSBM */

2006-03-10T20:21:54Z

‎Zelda in SSBM

Lesoria: /* Zelda in SSBM */

2006-03-10T20:03:42Z

‎Zelda in SSBM

Arturo: /* Article name */

2006-02-05T13:51:31Z

‎Article name

Arturo at 11:58, 5 February 2006

2006-02-05T11:58:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 15 March 2006
Line 88:		Line 88:

	Thanks! One suggestion: the naming standard should be [[Princess Zelda (LoZ)]] rather than [[Princess Zelda in LoZ]]. If you agree, I'll go ahead and move the existing articles. --[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 01:29, 15 March 2006 (EST)		Thanks! One suggestion: the naming standard should be [[Princess Zelda (LoZ)]] rather than [[Princess Zelda in LoZ]]. If you agree, I'll go ahead and move the existing articles. --[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 01:29, 15 March 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	I don't really like parenthesis, but do as you think it's better--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 08:59, 15 March 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 15 March 2006
Line 86:		Line 86:

	I had already suggested something similar. When I have time (If you haven't done it yet) I will go ahead and do it. Should SSBM go with Zelda general, with Zelda OoT or in another article?--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 13:22, 13 March 2006 (EST)		I had already suggested something similar. When I have time (If you haven't done it yet) I will go ahead and do it. Should SSBM go with Zelda general, with Zelda OoT or in another article?--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 13:22, 13 March 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Thanks! One suggestion: the naming standard should be [[Princess Zelda (LoZ)]] rather than [[Princess Zelda in LoZ]]. If you agree, I'll go ahead and move the existing articles. --[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 01:29, 15 March 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 13 March 2006
Line 84:		Line 84:

	This article has gotten massive, so I suggest the following reorganization. Keep the Princess Zelda article at a fairly normal length, explaining who the character Zelda is in general. Then, link to a separate Zelda article for each game. For example, Link to [[Princess Zelda (LoZ)]], [[Princess Zelda (AoL)]], etc. This will keep the article from getting unmanageably large. --[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 13:03, 13 March 2006 (EST)		This article has gotten massive, so I suggest the following reorganization. Keep the Princess Zelda article at a fairly normal length, explaining who the character Zelda is in general. Then, link to a separate Zelda article for each game. For example, Link to [[Princess Zelda (LoZ)]], [[Princess Zelda (AoL)]], etc. This will keep the article from getting unmanageably large. --[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 13:03, 13 March 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	I had already suggested something similar. When I have time (If you haven't done it yet) I will go ahead and do it. Should SSBM go with Zelda general, with Zelda OoT or in another article?--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 13:22, 13 March 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 13 March 2006
Line 80:		Line 80:

	Yes, there is. But unfortunately I don't have much time at this moment and therefore my updates of images and entries has come to a halt (for now). I am watching over the recent changes part to see any new updates, but it looks like everybody is on 'stand-by'. Now, On Topic; yes, I agree with Arturo that they should not be mixed. I did the same thing for Ganondorf and it looks like Sheik was already ordered in this way too.--[[User:Iron Knuckle\|Iron Knuckle]] 10:41, 11 March 2006 (EST)		Yes, there is. But unfortunately I don't have much time at this moment and therefore my updates of images and entries has come to a halt (for now). I am watching over the recent changes part to see any new updates, but it looks like everybody is on 'stand-by'. Now, On Topic; yes, I agree with Arturo that they should not be mixed. I did the same thing for Ganondorf and it looks like Sheik was already ordered in this way too.--[[User:Iron Knuckle\|Iron Knuckle]] 10:41, 11 March 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	== Reorganization suggestion ==
		+
		+	This article has gotten massive, so I suggest the following reorganization. Keep the Princess Zelda article at a fairly normal length, explaining who the character Zelda is in general. Then, link to a separate Zelda article for each game. For example, Link to [[Princess Zelda (LoZ)]], [[Princess Zelda (AoL)]], etc. This will keep the article from getting unmanageably large. --[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 13:03, 13 March 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 11 March 2006
Line 78:		Line 78:

	Is there anyone there??? I think that it should be out of the description since SSBM isn't a Zelda game, it's a non-canon game as the CDi games or Soul Callibur (Have I written it correctly?) are. For the same reason I think the trophies should not be with the rest of the quotes. I don't think it's a good idea to mix OoT, ALttP, MM, LoZ... with SSBM--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:32, 10 March 2006 (EST)		Is there anyone there??? I think that it should be out of the description since SSBM isn't a Zelda game, it's a non-canon game as the CDi games or Soul Callibur (Have I written it correctly?) are. For the same reason I think the trophies should not be with the rest of the quotes. I don't think it's a good idea to mix OoT, ALttP, MM, LoZ... with SSBM--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:32, 10 March 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Yes, there is. But unfortunately I don't have much time at this moment and therefore my updates of images and entries has come to a halt (for now). I am watching over the recent changes part to see any new updates, but it looks like everybody is on 'stand-by'. Now, On Topic; yes, I agree with Arturo that they should not be mixed. I did the same thing for Ganondorf and it looks like Sheik was already ordered in this way too.--[[User:Iron Knuckle\|Iron Knuckle]] 10:41, 11 March 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 10 March 2006
Line 76:		Line 76:

	Is it proper to put the SSBM information in its own section, or would it be better to place it into the ''Description'' section, under a subheading for the game? It seems out of place just to be out in the middle of the page under its own heading. Also, the trophey informatin, should it instead be under the relevant quotes area? --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 15:03, 10 March 2006 (EST)		Is it proper to put the SSBM information in its own section, or would it be better to place it into the ''Description'' section, under a subheading for the game? It seems out of place just to be out in the middle of the page under its own heading. Also, the trophey informatin, should it instead be under the relevant quotes area? --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 15:03, 10 March 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Is there anyone there??? I think that it should be out of the description since SSBM isn't a Zelda game, it's a non-canon game as the CDi games or Soul Callibur (Have I written it correctly?) are. For the same reason I think the trophies should not be with the rest of the quotes. I don't think it's a good idea to mix OoT, ALttP, MM, LoZ... with SSBM--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:32, 10 March 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:21, 10 March 2006
Line 75:		Line 75:
	==Zelda in SSBM==		==Zelda in SSBM==

−	Is it proper to put the SSBM information in its own section, or would it be better to place it into the ''Description' section, under a subheading for the game? It seems out of place just to be out in the middle of the page under its own heading. --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 15:03, 10 March 2006 (EST)	+	Is it proper to put the SSBM information in its own section, or would it be better to place it into the ''Description'' section, under a subheading for the game? It seems out of place just to be out in the middle of the page under its own heading. Also, the trophey informatin, should it instead be under the relevant quotes area? --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 15:03, 10 March 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:03, 10 March 2006
Line 72:		Line 72:
	But, personally, I think this article should be divided in parts. I don't think a really long article is the best solution.		But, personally, I think this article should be divided in parts. I don't think a really long article is the best solution.
	--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 06:54, 5 February 2006 (EST)		--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 06:54, 5 February 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	==Zelda in SSBM==
		+
		+	Is it proper to put the SSBM information in its own section, or would it be better to place it into the ''Description' section, under a subheading for the game? It seems out of place just to be out in the middle of the page under its own heading. --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 15:03, 10 March 2006 (EST)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 --[[User:Iron Knuckle|Iron Knuckle]] 03:03, 30 January 2006 (EST)
 :I don't know which way would be better or more consistent, but for now I'm redirecting Zelda to Princess Zelda just so we have all the information in one article. If anyone disagrees with this we can always change it later. -[[User:Davogones|davogones]] 15:11, 30 January 2006 (EST)
-::In my opnion it would be more consistent all the way round, as [[Ambi]] and [[Ruto (Sage)|Ruto]] are.--[[User:Arturo|Arturo]] 13:59, 31 January 2006 (EST)
+::In my opnion it would be more consistent all the way round, as [[Ambi]] and [[Ruto (Zora)|Ruto]] are.--[[User:Arturo|Arturo]] 13:59, 31 January 2006 (EST)
 :::This case is different because one may think that "Zelda" refers to the series of games, rather than to the character Princess Zelda. Maybe "Zelda" should be a disambiguation page. -[[User:Davogones|davogones]] 05:48, 5 February 2006 (EST)

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 Since Zelda makes appearances in a lot of games, I think that the description and biography should simply be combined into one writeup underneath each game. It's kind of counterproductive to have to read the description in one place, then scroll down to read the biography for the same character. -[[User:Davogones|davogones]] 05:51, 5 February 2006 (EST)
-Yes, I agree with you that it's a bit unconfortable to do that. Maybe we should put use this strcture:
+Yes, I agree with you that it's a bit unconfortable to do that. Maybe we should put use this structure:
-==LoZ==
+<nowiki>==LoZ==
 ===Description===
 ===Biography===
 ===Miscelllaneous notes===
 ===Relevant quotes===
 ===See also===
 ==AoL==
 ....
 But, personally, I think this article should be divided in parts. I don't think a really long article is the best solution.
 --[[User:Arturo|Arturo]] 06:54, 5 February 2006 (EST)