User talk:Davogones - Revision history

Lesoria: Page Creation Restrictions

2006-07-10T01:31:23Z

Page Creation Restrictions

Arturo: /* Ancient Sages */ Maybe in Requested articles...

2006-01-29T21:17:38Z

‎Ancient Sages: Maybe in Requested articles...

Davogones: /* Ancient Sages */

2006-01-29T21:08:26Z

‎Ancient Sages

Arturo: Ancient Sages

2006-01-29T20:50:49Z

Ancient Sages

Davogones at 18:52, 29 January 2006

2006-01-29T18:52:18Z

Arturo: Important articles

2006-01-29T18:14:43Z

Important articles

Lesoria: Magic/Techniques

2006-01-29T10:31:53Z

Magic/Techniques

Arturo: Categories deleted and undeleted

2006-01-26T14:56:31Z

Categories deleted and undeleted

Arturo: OoT and TMC rings

2006-01-25T20:24:33Z

OoT and TMC rings

Arturo: Hero's charm

2006-01-25T15:00:19Z

Hero's charm

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 10 July 2006
Line 47:		Line 47:
	::Oh, yes, that's a good idea. Maybe the page of Requested articles could be used for that purpose.		::Oh, yes, that's a good idea. Maybe the page of Requested articles could be used for that purpose.
	--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 16:17, 29 January 2006 (EST)		--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 16:17, 29 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	== Page Creation Restrictions ==
		+
		+	Hoi, I've been quite busy with work lately, and by looking at the "Recent Changes" list, it seems I'm not the only one busy these days. I decided to kick back and relax by adding some pages on Minish Cap characters, but I face a "This site has restricted the ability to create new pages." message when trying to add a page. Is it possible for my account to get page-creation permission, in case I find free time for adding more pages on Minish Cap characters, etc? Also, when Twilight Princess and Phantom Hourglass come out, you'll surely want a team of trust-worthy people with the ability to create many new pages, no? --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 21:31, 9 July 2006 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 29 January 2006
Line 45:		Line 45:
	Hi! I have already posted my idea in the main page talk. I only would like to ask you for a favour. Maybe you haven't seen it yet but I've written an article about the Ancient Sages from OoT. Could you look at it and correct it as you did with Rauru when you have time, please???--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:50, 29 January 2006 (EST)		Hi! I have already posted my idea in the main page talk. I only would like to ask you for a favour. Maybe you haven't seen it yet but I've written an article about the Ancient Sages from OoT. Could you look at it and correct it as you did with Rauru when you have time, please???--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:50, 29 January 2006 (EST)
	:I'll look at it when I have some time. Maybe it would be good to have some sort of peer review system set up, and have a page where you can request an article be reviewed? -[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 16:08, 29 January 2006 (EST)		:I'll look at it when I have some time. Maybe it would be good to have some sort of peer review system set up, and have a page where you can request an article be reviewed? -[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 16:08, 29 January 2006 (EST)
		+	::Oh, yes, that's a good idea. Maybe the page of Requested articles could be used for that purpose.
		+	--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 16:17, 29 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 29 January 2006
Line 44:		Line 44:

	Hi! I have already posted my idea in the main page talk. I only would like to ask you for a favour. Maybe you haven't seen it yet but I've written an article about the Ancient Sages from OoT. Could you look at it and correct it as you did with Rauru when you have time, please???--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:50, 29 January 2006 (EST)		Hi! I have already posted my idea in the main page talk. I only would like to ask you for a favour. Maybe you haven't seen it yet but I've written an article about the Ancient Sages from OoT. Could you look at it and correct it as you did with Rauru when you have time, please???--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:50, 29 January 2006 (EST)
		+	:I'll look at it when I have some time. Maybe it would be good to have some sort of peer review system set up, and have a page where you can request an article be reviewed? -[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 16:08, 29 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 29 January 2006
Line 40:		Line 40:
	Hi Davogones. I've got a suggestion about writing the most important articles, such as [[Zelda]], [[Link], [[Ganondorf]]... I think the easiest way to write them is to divide the work between some users, so someone writes about the Zelda from LoZ, another user writes about Zelda in AoL and so on... What do you think--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 13:14, 29 January 2006 (EST)		Hi Davogones. I've got a suggestion about writing the most important articles, such as [[Zelda]], [[Link], [[Ganondorf]]... I think the easiest way to write them is to divide the work between some users, so someone writes about the Zelda from LoZ, another user writes about Zelda in AoL and so on... What do you think--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 13:14, 29 January 2006 (EST)
	:Sounds like a good idea. I suppose if you want to write part of it, you could say so on the requested articles page and on the article's talk page. -[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 13:52, 29 January 2006 (EST)		:Sounds like a good idea. I suppose if you want to write part of it, you could say so on the requested articles page and on the article's talk page. -[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 13:52, 29 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	==Ancient Sages==
		+
		+	Hi! I have already posted my idea in the main page talk. I only would like to ask you for a favour. Maybe you haven't seen it yet but I've written an article about the Ancient Sages from OoT. Could you look at it and correct it as you did with Rauru when you have time, please???--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:50, 29 January 2006 (EST)

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 Hey, I'd like to go head and separate the Magic and Techniques categories, as was mentioned on my talk page.  I can do the conversion easily and completely, but want to get permission from up above before taking such a large action. --[[User:Lesoria|Lesoria]] 05:31, 29 January 2006 (EST)
 ==Important Articles==
 Hi Davogones. I've got a suggestion about writing the most important articles, such as [[Zelda]], [[Link], [[Ganondorf]]... I think the easiest way to write them is to divide the work between some users, so someone writes about the Zelda from LoZ, another user writes about Zelda in AoL and so on... What do you think--[[User:Arturo|Arturo]] 13:14, 29 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 29 January 2006
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Hey, I'd like to go head and separate the Magic and Techniques categories, as was mentioned on my talk page. I can do the conversion easily and completely, but want to get permission from up above before taking such a large action. --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 05:31, 29 January 2006 (EST)		Hey, I'd like to go head and separate the Magic and Techniques categories, as was mentioned on my talk page. I can do the conversion easily and completely, but want to get permission from up above before taking such a large action. --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 05:31, 29 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	==Important Articles==
		+
		+	Hi Davogones. I've got a suggestion about writing the most important articles, such as [[Zelda]], [[Link], [[Ganondorf]]... I think the easiest way to write them is to divide the work between some users, so someone writes about the Zelda from LoZ, another user writes about Zelda in AoL and so on... What do you think--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 13:14, 29 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:31, 29 January 2006
Line 30:		Line 30:

	The two categories you have deleted (OoT &TMC) are still in Zelda Rings. There are also two categories that shouldn't be there in Zelda Masks: FS Songs and aLttP Rings. I think TWW masks should be rewritten, Hero's charm is a mask--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 09:56, 26 January 2006 (EST)		The two categories you have deleted (OoT &TMC) are still in Zelda Rings. There are also two categories that shouldn't be there in Zelda Masks: FS Songs and aLttP Rings. I think TWW masks should be rewritten, Hero's charm is a mask--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 09:56, 26 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	== Magic/Techniques ==
		+
		+	Hey, I'd like to go head and separate the Magic and Techniques categories, as was mentioned on my talk page. I can do the conversion easily and completely, but want to get permission from up above before taking such a large action. --[[User:Lesoria\|Lesoria]] 05:31, 29 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 26 January 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:

	I think the TWW masks categories should exist, because Hero's charm is a mask. It's just an opinion.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 10:00, 25 January 2006 (EST)		I think the TWW masks categories should exist, because Hero's charm is a mask. It's just an opinion.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 10:00, 25 January 2006 (EST)
		+

	There are two other categories that should be removed: OoT and TMC rings--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:24, 25 January 2006 (EST)		There are two other categories that should be removed: OoT and TMC rings--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:24, 25 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+
		+	The two categories you have deleted (OoT &TMC) are still in Zelda Rings. There are also two categories that shouldn't be there in Zelda Masks: FS Songs and aLttP Rings. I think TWW masks should be rewritten, Hero's charm is a mask--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 09:56, 26 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 25 January 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:

	I think the TWW masks categories should exist, because Hero's charm is a mask. It's just an opinion.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 10:00, 25 January 2006 (EST)		I think the TWW masks categories should exist, because Hero's charm is a mask. It's just an opinion.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 10:00, 25 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	There are two other categories that should be removed: OoT and TMC rings--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 15:24, 25 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 25 January 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:
	I don't know if you mind this, but after you removed all the unnecessary categories like Rings/Mask for most zelda games 217.20.113.110 added these all over again. I don't know who this anonymous person is, but I thought you wanted these unnecessary categories out of the picture.		I don't know if you mind this, but after you removed all the unnecessary categories like Rings/Mask for most zelda games 217.20.113.110 added these all over again. I don't know who this anonymous person is, but I thought you wanted these unnecessary categories out of the picture.
	:Thanks for pointing this out. I think somebody used a bot to do this. It should be impossible to edit anonymously, but it looks like a bot can pull it off. It also looks like the edits were automated, simply reverting the last 20 deletes or so. I'll have to find a way to keep unauthorized bot activity out. -[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 03:59, 25 January 2006 (EST)		:Thanks for pointing this out. I think somebody used a bot to do this. It should be impossible to edit anonymously, but it looks like a bot can pull it off. It also looks like the edits were automated, simply reverting the last 20 deletes or so. I'll have to find a way to keep unauthorized bot activity out. -[[User:Davogones\|davogones]] 03:59, 25 January 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	I think the TWW masks categories should exist, because Hero's charm is a mask. It's just an opinion.--[[User:Arturo\|Arturo]] 10:00, 25 January 2006 (EST)